Case studies / Relocation Agent Network

Relocation Agent Network Q&A Series - Q1 How do you rate RAN?

Malcolm Prescott, Director, Webbers

Webbers needed a reliable, accountable way to assess whether network membership would deliver measurable returns rather than intangible brand benefits only.

In this Q1 instalment of the RAN Q&A Series from Webbers, Malcolm Prescott offers his direct, director-level rating of the Relocation Agent Network. Malcolm's verdict is unambiguously positive — he describes RAN as a supplier relationship that delivers on its promise, a standard he applies carefully. His assessment covers the full breadth of member value, including referral income, community access, and the credibility that comes with being a RAN-designated agent. He reflects that Webbers' sustained membership has been consistently positive and expresses the view that joining earlier would have generated even greater cumulative returns. His candid endorsement provides prospective members with a credible, experience-grounded perspective on what RAN membership means in practice.

Key points

RAN delivers on its promise — and that's not something I say about every supplier relationship. The ROI is tangible, the member benefits are real, and the overall experience of being part of the network has been consistently positive for Webbers. If I'm honest, my only regret is not joining sooner.

Malcolm Prescott, Director, Webbers

Video

Relocation Agent Network Q&A Series - Q1 How do you rate RAN?

Relocation Agent Network on Kerfuffle: reviews from UK estate agents